Monday, January 14, 2008

University of Michigan Confidence Unexpectedly Improved in Early January

The preliminary January University of Michigan confidence survey unexpectedly rebounded to 80.5 from 75.5 in December.  Consensus estimates had looked for a decline to 74.5 in January.  The December reading was the second lowest level for the confidence indicator in 15 years.  The only lower reading was right after Hurricane Katrina when it dipped to 74.2.  Otherwise, it hit a low of 63.9 in October 1990, during the last recession.  For all of last year, the index averaged 86.1.  Today's figure brings the index back to October's level.
 
Current conditions rose to 98.1 from 91 last month, and the outlook for the future rose to 69.1 from 65.6 in December.
 
Inflation expectations held steady for the next year at 3.4%, but eased for the longer term to 3% from 3.1%.  Both inflation indexes remain at or near their highs for the past year.
 
NOTE -  President Bush is scheduled to speak on the economy this morning at 11:50 AM.
 
*****************
 
The index of leading economic indicators fell again in December, declining -.2% MoM (consensus -.1% MoM).  This is the third straight monthly decline, and indicates further economic deterioration over the next 3-6 months. 
January 14, 2008    TIDBITS

Money Markets Show Signs of Improvement
From Lehman:  “3mo libor sets down over 20 bps to 4.055…FF-3ml basis continues to come in as we get further away from calendar year-end.”
From Merrill Lynch:  “The logjam in the money market has been unclogged to some extent with Libor coming down from its December highs – but nothing is back to normal and in other parts of the credit market, spreads are widening sharply. In fact, in the high-yield segment, the average interest rate has broken above 10% for the first time since April/03 and spreads have blown out to 668 bps from 308 bps in mid- 2007 (and the widest they have been since June 2003).”
From CITI:  Last week, the Fed reported an increase ($5bn) in the stock of outstanding US ABCP to $779bn. Spreads on CP in both the US and Europe continue to drop. All of which suggests that a degree of normalcy is returning to the CP markets as investors who had previously sat on the sidelines in the run-up to year-end slowly return to the market. “
From HSBC:  “The inter-bank crisis appears to be easing, albeit still a long way from normal. Three-month LIBOR has persistently declined over the past five weeks from 5.15% on 5 December to 4.06% now. In other words, 3-month LIBOR is now below the spot Fed funds rate for the first time since the 2001-2003 easing cycle.  Although this is a psychological advance for the Fed, the more relevant inter-bank spread is between 3-month LIBOR and the expected Fed funds rate over the next three months. On this basis, the news is also helpful.  The spread has come in from a peak of 106bp on December 4 to 46bp now. This is higher than the spread pre-August 2007, when it was averaging about 10bp, but at least things are moving in the right direction.  The hope is that as inter-bank lending fears decline, other spreads related more closely to the consumer, and hence the real economy, will also improve. That is not the case so far. The spread between the 30-year jumbo fixed mortgage rate and the 30-year fixed conventional mortgage rate has remained near the highs. Having improved in September and October, the spread is about as high today as it was during the worst of the crisis in late August. This suggests that as the financial crunch heals, a broader credit crunch is out of the bag.”
From Cumberland Advisors:  our conclusion is that the Fed has dropped the annual financing cost to global users of US dollar denominated credit by 1% on $150 trillion in just a few weeks.   If the Fed cuts 50 basis points AND if they drop the Discount Window rate by 50 basis points AND if the LIBOR follows, then, we will witness LIBOR with a 3-handle and the effect on $150 trillion of debt cost will respond accordingly.  The Fed’s impact on LIBOR is a seminal event and is potentially powerful and enormously stimulative.   It should not be underestimated.  This outcome is cause for optimism.  It contradicts the present rampant and extreme pessimism in the markets.  To this writer, it suggests that any recession we MAY experience will be shorter lived and not too deep.”

Consumer Spending Slowing
From The New York Times:  “Strong evidence is emerging that consumer spending, a bulwark against recession over the last year even as energy prices surged and the housing market sputtered, has begun to slow sharply at every level of the American economy, from the working class to the wealthy… American Express said that starting in early December the growth in the rate of spending by its 52 million cardholders, a generally affluent group of consumers, fell 3 percentage points, from 13 percent to 10 percent, the first slowdown since the 2001 recession… Even in tough economic times Americans rarely reduce their consumption, preferring instead to slow the growth in their spending. Since 1980, they have cut spending in only five quarters — a total of 15 months — most of them in the depths of a recession. The 2001 recession passed without a cutback in consumer spending.  Only once before, in 1980, did consumer spending fall during a presidential election year… Official statistics do not yet show that consumer spending has dropped, but they do suggest that in late 2007, it slowed in areas like automobiles, furniture, building materials and health care… Perhaps the strongest barometer over the last 30 days is the performance of the country’s big chain stores. December turned out to be a blood bath for retailers at every rung on the economic ladder, with sales for the month growing at the slowest rate in seven years.  Sales at stores open at least a year, a crucial yardstick in retailing, plunged by 11 percent at Kohl’s and 7.9 percent at Macy’s, compared with last year… store sales fell 4 percent at Nordstrom, the high-end department store… the number of overdue payments on American Express cards is surging, the company said — and this among well-heeled cardholders… “We are seeing a correlation with housing prices,” said Michael O’Neill, a spokesman for American Express. “The falloff in spending is everywhere in the country, but it is greatest in those areas like south Florida and California, where home prices have fallen the most.”  The big exception is gasoline. American Express and the Consumer Federation of America say that consumers are buying just as many gallons as ever, but paying more for them, and that has forced cutbacks in other purchases… There are some bright spots now in consumer spending. Sales of sports gear and electronic gadgets — particularly G.P.S. navigation devices and flat-panel television sets — have risen over the last three months.”
From FTN:  “Consumer spending accounts for 70% of the economy. The only reason so many economists have not yet forecast a recession in 2008, including those at the Fed, is the strength of consumer spending in late 2007, especially in November when retail sales and consumption rose more than 1%. If fourth quarter sales turn out to be weaker, look for the recession forecast to gain a lot more support.”

Economic Legend Blames Fed for Credit Bubble Creation and Fallout
From The Telegraph:  “As rebukes go in the close-knit world of central banking, few hurt as much as the scathing indictment of US Federal Reserve policy by Professor Anna Schwartz.  The high priestess of US monetarism -- a revered figure at the Fed -- says the central bank is itself the chief cause of the credit bubble and now seems stunned as the consequences of its own actions engulf the financial system.  "The new group at the Fed is not equal to the problem that faces it," she says, daring to utter a thought that fellow critics mostly utter sotto voce.  "They need to speak frankly to the market and acknowledge how bad the problems are, and acknowledge their own failures in letting this happen. This is what is needed to restore confidence," she told The Sunday Telegraph.   "There never would have been a sub-prime mortgage crisis if the Fed had been alert. This is something Alan Greenspan must answer for," she says… Her fame comes from a joint opus with Nobel laureate Milton Friedman: "A Monetary History of the United States." It revolutionised thinking on the causes of the Great Depression when published in 1965. The book blamed the Fed for causing the slump. The bank failed to use its full bag of tricks to stop the implosion of the money stock, and turned a bust into calamity by raising rates… Schwartz warns against facile comparisons between today's world and the gold standard era. "This is nothing like the Depression. I don't really believe the economy as a whole is going to fall apart… More than 4,000 US banks -- a fifth -- collapsed in the 1930s. There was no deposit insurance. Real economic output fell by a third, prices by a quarter, and unemployment reached a third. Real income fell by 11 per cent, 9 per cent, 18 per cent, and 3 per cent in the years to 1933.  According to Schwartz the original sin of the Bernanke-Greenspan Fed was to hold rates at 1 per cent from 2003 to June 2004, long after the dotcom bubble was over. "It is clear that monetary policy was too accommodative. Rates of 1 per cent were bound to encourage all kinds of risky behaviour," Schwartz says.  She is scornful of Greenspan's campaign to clear his name by blaming the bubble on an Asian savings glut, which purportedly created stimulus beyond the control of the Fed by driving down global bond rates. "This attempt to exculpate himself is not convincing. The Fed failed to confront something that was evident. It can't be blamed on global events," she says.  That mistake is behind us now. The lesson of the 1930s is that swift action is needed once the credit system starts to implode: when banks hoard money, refusing to pass on funds. The Fed must tear up the rulebook. Yet it has been hesitant for three months, relying on lubricants -- not shock therapy.  "Liquidity doesn't do anything in this situation. It cannot deal with the underlying fear that lots of firms are going bankrupt," Schwartz says… Bernanke did indeed switch tack on Thursday. "We stand ready to take substantive additional action as needed," he says, warning of a "fragile situation…Bernanke insists that the Fed has leant the lesson from the catastrophic errors of the 1930s. At the late Milton Friedman's 90th birthday party, he apologised for the sins of his institutional forefathers. "Yes, we did it. We're very sorry. We won't do it again."”
From The Wall Street Journal:  “U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, facing
criticism that the central bank has sent confusing messages about interest rates in recent months, has decided to speak more forcefully and more often… reflects a new strategy of having the central bank's top leaders discuss the economic outlook in public more often, so that markets won't depend on remarks by lower-ranked policy makers who may not represent Fed thinking. Thus, either Mr. Bernanke or Mr. Kohn will likely address the outlook in public at least once between meetings of the FOMC.”

Bank of America Gambles in Buying Countrywide
From Economist:  Countrywide, battered by an over-reliance on fickle wholesale funding and by fast-rising delinquencies (in good-quality mortgages as well as subprime ones) had been forced several times to deny that it was about to go bust. Banking is about confidence, and the markets did not believe its claims to have ample liquidity. Wall Street firms were increasingly worried that Countrywide would default on the huge pile of derivatives contracts it had struck with them in an effort to hedge its mortgage exposures. Regulators, too, were nervous: the liabilities of Countrywide’s bank had ballooned as it offered depositors high rates to keep itself funded. This raised the uncomfortable prospect of big payouts by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, should Countrywide have had to file for bankrupcty. Regulators probably helped to smooth the deal’s passage.  It carries big risks for BofA. It is buying a mortgage book that continues to deteriorate. Countrywide also faces a welter of lawsuits over its marketing of subprime loans. That said, the price looks potentially alluring—a mere eighth of Countrywide’s value a few months ago. Mr Lewis has long said that he likes the mortgage business, in which BofA trails its peers, but he feels that the mortgage companies themselves have been valued too highly. No one knows if that is still true of Countrywide, but there may be no better time to find out. And BofA, which has had teams poring over Countrywide’s books, probably knows its value better than any other outsider.  BofA perhaps felt compelled to intervene to protect its earlier investment. And it is better placed to act than others. It has been far less damaged by the mortgage mess than its arch-rival, Citigroup (though it has booked sizeable investment-banking losses). Having trailed for years, BofA is now worth $34 billion more than Citi. If the Countrywide deal pays off, it will be the undisputed leader in mortgages, as well as in credit cards (thanks to its purchase of MBNA three years ago) and overall retail banking (it is the only bank close to the 10% regulatory ceiling on nationwide deposits).  Countrywide’s attractions have been all but forgotten amid the über-pessimism over housing. It has 9m mortgage customers, to whom BofA will be itching to sell other financial products (though cross-selling is not easy). Its mortgage platform has unparalleled technology. The key will be to combine its loan-origination clout with BofA’s strength in distribution to investors. In short, Countrywide has plenty of franchise value… Even in the short term, it will be attractive for careful lenders, since profit margins have widened as credit has dried up. BofA is promising caution. It will ringfence Countrywide’s non-performing loans, handing them to a special workout team. And it will stop making subprime loans altogether. Not that Countrywide is doing much of that anyway: it lent a mere $6m to subprime borrowers in December, down from $3.7 billion in the same month of 2006.  The risks of this deal should not be underplayed. But BofA will see advantages beyond a potential lift to its mortgage business. The deal neatly lets it breach the 10% deposit ceiling because, under an arcane law, a bank can do so if it is through a takeover of another bank with a thrift charter (which Countrywide has). And the takeover will let it curry favour with regulators and politicians who want to see the markets stabilise.”

Shrinking U.S. Trade Deficit Requires Reducing U.S. Consumption
From John Mauldin:  “…the trade deficit is not going to come down until the US starts to save more and spend less. In 1992, consumer spending was a little over 65% of GDP. It is now closer to 72%. Savings are down from 8% in that time, to barely above zero. If US consumers simply saved 5%, as we did 10 years ago, the trade deficit would come down by a lot… Another $15 a barrel could add as much as $50 billion to the annual trade deficit.  That means oil alone will soon be more than 60% of our trade deficit, if oil stays above $90 a barrel.  Hard to cut the deficit with a lower dollar if we keep buying expensive oil… You reduce the trade deficit by spending less and exporting more.
However, we would have to grow exports by 90% to balance the trade deficit. Exports are up by 12% over a year ago, and most categories are up, but it is simply not realistic to think we can grow our way out of the trade deficit.  The heavy lifting on reducing the deficit is going to be by a reduction in spending. And that is only going to happen when people realize they have not saved enough for retirement and their homes are not a piggy bank that can be cashed out for retirement. And reduced consumer spending will not happen on just imports. It will be across the board and a drag on the economy.
From Business Week:  U.S. policymakers are mollycoddling American consumers. Of particular concern is the Bush administration's mortgage-freeze plan. By unilaterally shifting the financial pain to lenders, many of whom live overseas and don't vote in U.S. elections, politicians are making it clear that American consumers will not be allowed to suffer the ill effects of excessive indebtedness.  Damaging as the plan may be, it is nothing compared with what some presidential candidates and members of Congress are cooking up. As the housing crisis gets political, we can expect ideas such as a perpetual freeze on foreclosures, automatic loan reductions and enormous tax breaks financed by increased deficit spending. Delinquencies on auto loans are reaching record highs. What's next, a moratorium on car payments? In an election year, anything is possible.  With the U.S. economy finally stalling under its gargantuan debt burden, the rallying cries for Fed rate cuts have been deafening. Although "Helicopter" Ben Bernanke has done his part by cutting rates 100 basis points and devising new ways to shower the country in cash, his efforts have not been enough for ravenous bankers and politicians. Their zeal to keep the housing bubble from deflating, and the economy from tipping into recession, should make it clear to foreign investors that the United States will continue to rely on dollar depreciation as a blunt instrument to fight all its economic battles. As a result, America will remain a financial black hole in the coming year.  These are real risks that will not go unnoticed by a world already saturated with depreciating U.S.-dollar-denominated debt. Given that access to foreign savings is vital to America's economic survival, we should think twice before biting the hands that feed us.”

Goldman Sachs Reduces GDP Estimates for Asia Due to Slowing US Economy
From Goldman Sachs:  “Our US Economics Team has revised down their growth forecasts to show a mild recession this year, with GDP falling at an annualized one percentage point in 2Q and 3Q. As a result, we have cut our 2008 GDP growth forecast for Asia ex Japan to 8.3% from 8.6% before and compared to a consensus of 8.7%. In 2009, we now look for growth of 8.5% compared to 8.6% previously. Overall, these forecast reductions are meaningful but not disastrous-the impact on currencies is in general likely to be contained, although equity markets could be in for more volatility. China: More headwinds from trade-trimming our growth forecast to 10% for 2008 Given the significant contribution to growth from net exports, a meaningful slowdown in global demand, triggered by a US recession, would surely have a notable impact on China’s growth and corporate profitability. Therefore, we are lowering our already below-consensus 2008 growth forecast for China still further to 10% from 10.3%, with most of the additional weakness coming from slower export growth. Can India ride out the US recession storm? We are revising down our GDP growth forecast to 7.8% from 8% for FY09 due to a larger slowdown in external demand. We estimate that export growth will halve in FY09 to 9.8% from 18.6% due to the global slowdown as well as INR appreciation. However, the Indian economy remains largely on course due to structural strength. We expect the RBI to ease monetary policy in FY09 and for the INR to appreciate further against the USD in 2008. Taiwan: Navigating through the political landscape, amid weaker external demand In light of the downgrade to our GDP forecasts for the US and Asia, we are also revising our 2008 and 2009 GDP growth forecasts for Taiwan to 3.8% and 4.6% respectively, from our previous forecasts of 4.2% and 4.8% respectively. Our new forecasts put us below consensus… Our 2008 growth forecast for Japan was already below the market consensus, but we are lowering it still further to +1.0% from +1.2%. We are raising our 2008 CPI inflation forecast to +0.5% from +0.3% because CPI inflation is currently being fueled by surging crude oil prices. Excluding food and energy, however, and we expect CPI to remain low for the time being. A US recession and aggressive monetary easing by the Fed are likely to place major constraints on BOJ monetary policy. We are now forecasting that the BOJ will forego rate hikes entirely in 2008 and resume tightening in April-June 2009. The greatest challenge for the Japanese economy is a sustained recovery in private consumption. Innumerable obstacles stand in the way, most notably a decline in real purchasing power against a backdrop of stagnant wages and continued price increases on daily necessities.”
From JP Morgan:  One surprise from last week’s reports was the extent of the slowdown in China’s exports in 4Q07, which rose at a mere 2% annual rate, the smallest increase of the expansion by far. The growth of fixed asset investment also is thought to be slowing. These are substantial drags on manufacturing output, which is drawing support principally from the consumer sector. Our team expects that GDP growth eased to about 7.5% last quarter—near trend, but half the pace of 1H07. The Chinese government has taken steps to slow export growth, so it is hard to tell how much "signal" we’re getting from China about global demand.”
From Economist:  “Exports are the fulcrum of China's economic miracle, right? Not really, say some economists. Data issued by Chinese authorities show that exports amounted to almost 40% of gross domestic product in 2007. But Jonathan Anderson of Swiss bank UBS reckons that figure falls below 10% if imported components are stripped out. By that measure, China lags the U.S., where, in the first nine months of last year, net exports represented 30% of gross domestic product. The dynamo of the Chinese economy, as it turns out, is investment, much of it in infrastructure and heavy industry, with only 7% directly related to exports.”
From Deutsche Bank:  “On Friday, China said its forex reserves increased to $1.53 tn. This represents only a $95 bn or 6.6% quarterly increase, which is on par with Q3. Also, the growth rate of exports fell for the second straight month, likely due to a slower global economy.”

Lehman Reduces Growth Prospects for Europe
From Lehman:  “[European] GDP growth appears to have retreated considerably in Q4, falling to less than half the 0.8% q-o-q growth rate seen in Q3: we cut our estimate for Q4 from 0.4% q-o-q (sa) to 0.3% last week.  The main reason for looking for weaker growth is a loss of momentum in the industrial sector. This is augmented by a likely decline in retail spending at the aggregate level, only partly offset by stronger new car registrations.  We expect growth to slow further in Q1, as a slight recovery in household consumption should be dominated by even more weakness in investment, in part due to distortions in Germany associated with the expiry of accelerated depreciation allowances. More fundamentally, we expect investment growth to be low this year as firms’ access to bank financing becomes scarcer and more costly owing to the credit crunch and lower expected global growth filters through.”
From Merrill Lynch:  “The World Bank just cut its 2008 world growth outlook to 3.3% versus 3.6% in 2007 and 3.9% in 2006.  And the just-reported OECD leading indicator fell 0.5 points in November for the sixth time in as many months to its lowest level since August 2003.  So it would seem as though the US slowdown is beginning to leave its mark, at least through the industrialized world.”

MISC

From UBS:  “…today's WSJ suggests that while unlikely/remote, an inter-meeting [Fed rate] cut could come if the economic outlook deteriorates sharply in the coming days.”

From Market News International:  “The Kuwaiti Investment Authority is expected to be a major investor in a planned $4 bln capital raising by Merrill Lynch - FT.  Citigroup is putting the final touches to its second big    capital-raising, seeking up to $14 bln from Chinese, Kuwaiti and public market investors - FT.  Citigroup's plans to raise capital by selling a stake of about $2 billion to China Development Bank could be in jeopardy because of opposition from China's government.-WSJ”

From Bloomberg:  “The dollar fell to within a cent of its all-time low versus the euro on speculation U.S. interest rates will drop below those of the 15 nations that share the single European currency for the first time in three years… Fed funds futures contracts on the Chicago Board of Trade show 58 percent odds the Fed will cut its target rate for
overnight bank loans to 3.75 percent at its Jan. 30 meeting. The odds have risen from no chance a month ago. The odds of a decrease to 3.5 percent were 42 percent, compared with zero a week ago. The ECB kept its benchmark rate unchanged at 4 percent last week.  The yield spread between German two-year notes and same- maturity Treasuries was 1.12 percentage points, near the widest since November 2002.”

From Citi:  “We have just moved to the widest 2 year versus Fed funds inversion in a quarter of a century.”

From BMO:  2-year Treasury rates slid 19 bps to 2.56% last week after Bernanke flung open the door for aggressive easing. The 2-year rate is the lowest since the fed funds rate was at 1.75% more than three years ago. The 10-year rate dipped a lesser 8 bps to 3.79%, trolling four-year lows. With the Fed now in full reflation mode as it tries to get ahead of recession risks, the 10s-2s spread of 122 beeps is the steepest in three years.”

From Bear Stearns:  With the 30-year conventional mortgage rate dipping below 6.0% for the first time since 2005 there has been an increased focus on the potential for a major refinancing wave to sweep through the mortgage market. Indeed, at the current mortgage rate level of 5.90% we find that 37% ($1.81 trillion) of the conforming mortgage universe is refinanceable. If rates decline another 25 bps from here exposure increases to 50% ($2.47 trillion).  However, we do not expect today’s refinancing response to match the magnitude or intensity of prior”

From Bloomberg:  “U.S. existing home sales will fall 13 percent this year before recovering in 2009, according to a forecast by the Mortgage Bankers Association, the industry's largest trade group… New home sales likely will tumble 15 percent to 666,000
from 2007, before rising 6.6 percent in 2009… Mortgage originations for loans to buy homes will decline 18 percent to $955 billion in 2008, the report said. That's almost
half the $1.5 trillion lent in 2005 as the five-year real estate boom peaked. In 2009, purchase originations will rise 5 percent to $1 trillion, MBA said.  Loan refinancing will fall about 14 percent to $1 trillion this year…”

From Merrill Lynch:  “The precious metals complex is bid following Friday's "inflationary" DoA crops report that has sent the grains complex to new highs - that and aggressive market positioning for the Fed have taken gold up $15/oz so far today to $910/oz.  Interestingly, 10-year TIPS breakevens have come down to 223 bps, so not everyone is buying into the inflation story.”

From CNBC:  Citigroup plans to announce a writedown of as much as $24 billion and layoffs that could total as much as 24,000 due to subprime and credit-related losses, CNBC has learned. The plans will be unveiled Tuesday by Citigroup's new CEO, Vikram S. Pandit, after the banking giant reports fourth-quarter earnings. At the same time, Citigroup could also announce that it is cutting its dividend payment… Citigroup  also intends to raise as much as $15 billion from various foreign and domestic entities including Saudi Arabial Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, Citigroup's largest individual shareholder…”

From UBS:  “…the break lower in stocks has also been associated with a rise in volume —lending credence to the notion that the Bull move in S&P’s is over and that a new Bear phase has begun.”

From Merrill Lynch:  “The S&P 500 is off to its worst start since 1982 (-4.6%) and the Dow is off to its worst start since 1991 (-5.0%) – and both were recession years: Equities are now off for three weeks in a row in a losing streak not seen since last August, when the Fed was forced to cut the discount rate intermeeting and change its growth outlook.
Tech has actually surpassed financials on the down escalator – down 9.5% YTD versus down 5.4%. Meanwhile, health care is up 3.4% and utilities are up 1.7%, so not only the headline averages but the sector rotation is telling you that recession risks are alive and well. The fact that the yield curve – 10-year note yield minus the Fed funds rate – has been negative for 18 months in a row is a sure sign that the downturn has arrived. If not, it would be the first time that such a prolonged inversion failed to usher in a transition phase for the real economy.”

From Merrill Lynch:  “Food prices are soaring again on the latest bullish (not bullish for the buyer) DoA crop report, which sent corn futures to fresh 12-year highs… we have wheat at an all-time high with stockpiles at their lowest level since – get this – 1947. Soybean prices are at a 34-year high. This is an added source of angst for the consumer.”

From RBSGC:  “MBS Holdings Increased $9 bn, First Time in Four Weeks. MBS holdings by US banks increased $9 bn with pass-through holdings up $6 bn and CMO holdings up $3 bn. MBS holdings were down $41 bn over the last year (2007). Deposits decreased $17 bn over the past week. Deposits increased $518 bn over 2007. Commercial and industrial loans increased $4 bn for all banks over the week. C&I loans increased $243 bn over the last year. Whole loan holdings were virtually unchanged over the week. Over 2007, whole loan holdings increased by $214 bn.”

From JP Morgan:  “Barring a serious economic downturn, we expect financial firms’ capital requirements to be digestible. Concerns that issuance of stocks and bonds could overwhelm the markets in 2008 seem misplaced.  Although many banks and investment banks in North America and Europe have taken very large write-offs and face slower revenue growth, we expect internal measures, such as dividend reduction and suspension of share repurchases, to minimize the need for securities issuance. We think many banks will shrink their balance sheets, reducing the need for capital but also hampering credit creation.  The insurance and reinsurance industries are generally strong, and have relatively small needs for additional capital. Many bond insurers will require additional capital to cover their losses on collateralized debt obligations, but the sums involved are small relative to overall financial-sector issuance.  To the extent that financial firms require additional capital, we expect them to favor preferred and convertible securities over hybrids and common equity.”

From John Mauldin:  “The bottom half of taxpayers only pay 3% of the total income taxes collected, which is 1% less than before the Bush tax cuts. 44% of the US [adult] population, or 122 million people, pay no income tax at all.  The richest 1% of the country pay 39% of all taxes ($365,000 income and up), which is 3% more than before the Bush tax cuts, under the Clinton tax policy. The top 5% ($145,000) pay 60% of all taxes (up 5% from 1999); and the top 25%, with income over $62,000, paid 86% of all taxes…Every category is paying more now than under Clinton, except the bottom 75%.”
[Note – current U.S. population is 303 million, 2006 median U.S. household income was $48,200, based on U.S. Census data]

From Fidelity:  “Over the last 10 years, 72% of the world's best-performing stocks were based outside the United States.  International markets have delivered nearly twice the returns of domestic markets over the past five years.  On average, individual investors allocate only 7% of their portfolios to international investments, while professionally managed pension plans allocate 17%.

End-of-Day Market Update

From SunTrust:  “Stocks managed a triple-digit gain for a change. Bond prices are undeterred by equity strength and continue to hug recent highs on expectations of additional bank write-downs and weak economic news. In addition, there are a few random hopes out there for an inter-meeting cut from the FED any day. Event risk increases sharply beginning tomorrow.”

From RBSGC:  “Domestic equity prices gained throughout much of the session, with the DJIA, S&P 500, and NASDAQ all up more than 1%.”

Three month T-Bill yield rose 6bp to 3.15%.
Two year T-Note yield rose 1bp to 2.56%
Ten year T-Note yield fell 0 bp to 3.78%
2/10 Treasury curve flattened 1bp to 122bp
Dow rose 172 to 12,778 
S&P 500 rose 15 to 1416
Dollar index fell .37 to 75.61
Gold rose $10.5 to $906 (New all-time record high)
Oil rose $1.50 to $94.16
*All prices as of  4:10pm




January 14, 2008    TIDBITS

Money Markets Show Signs of Improvement
From Lehman:  “3mo libor sets down over 20 bps to 4.055…FF-3ml basis continues to come in as we get further away from calendar year-end.”
From Merrill Lynch:  “The logjam in the money market has been unclogged to some extent with Libor coming down from its December highs – but nothing is back to normal and in other parts of the credit market, spreads are widening sharply. In fact, in the high-yield segment, the average interest rate has broken above 10% for the first time since April/03 and spreads have blown out to 668 bps from 308 bps in mid- 2007 (and the widest they have been since June 2003).”
From CITI:  Last week, the Fed reported an increase ($5bn) in the stock of outstanding US ABCP to $779bn. Spreads on CP in both the US and Europe continue to drop. All of which suggests that a degree of normalcy is returning to the CP markets as investors who had previously sat on the sidelines in the run-up to year-end slowly return to the market. “
From HSBC:  “The inter-bank crisis appears to be easing, albeit still a long way from normal. Three-month LIBOR has persistently declined over the past five weeks from 5.15% on 5 December to 4.06% now. In other words, 3-month LIBOR is now below the spot Fed funds rate for the first time since the 2001-2003 easing cycle.  Although this is a psychological advance for the Fed, the more relevant inter-bank spread is between 3-month LIBOR and the expected Fed funds rate over the next three months. On this basis, the news is also helpful.  The spread has come in from a peak of 106bp on December 4 to 46bp now. This is higher than the spread pre-August 2007, when it was averaging about 10bp, but at least things are moving in the right direction.  The hope is that as inter-bank lending fears decline, other spreads related more closely to the consumer, and hence the real economy, will also improve. That is not the case so far. The spread between the 30-year jumbo fixed mortgage rate and the 30-year fixed conventional mortgage rate has remained near the highs. Having improved in September and October, the spread is about as high today as it was during the worst of the crisis in late August. This suggests that as the financial crunch heals, a broader credit crunch is out of the bag.”
From Cumberland Advisors:  our conclusion is that the Fed has dropped the annual financing cost to global users of US dollar denominated credit by 1% on $150 trillion in just a few weeks.   If the Fed cuts 50 basis points AND if they drop the Discount Window rate by 50 basis points AND if the LIBOR follows, then, we will witness LIBOR with a 3-handle and the effect on $150 trillion of debt cost will respond accordingly.  The Fed’s impact on LIBOR is a seminal event and is potentially powerful and enormously stimulative.   It should not be underestimated.  This outcome is cause for optimism.  It contradicts the present rampant and extreme pessimism in the markets.  To this writer, it suggests that any recession we MAY experience will be shorter lived and not too deep.”

Consumer Spending Slowing
From The New York Times:  “Strong evidence is emerging that consumer spending, a bulwark against recession over the last year even as energy prices surged and the housing market sputtered, has begun to slow sharply at every level of the American economy, from the working class to the wealthy… American Express said that starting in early December the growth in the rate of spending by its 52 million cardholders, a generally affluent group of consumers, fell 3 percentage points, from 13 percent to 10 percent, the first slowdown since the 2001 recession… Even in tough economic times Americans rarely reduce their consumption, preferring instead to slow the growth in their spending. Since 1980, they have cut spending in only five quarters — a total of 15 months — most of them in the depths of a recession. The 2001 recession passed without a cutback in consumer spending.  Only once before, in 1980, did consumer spending fall during a presidential election year… Official statistics do not yet show that consumer spending has dropped, but they do suggest that in late 2007, it slowed in areas like automobiles, furniture, building materials and health care… Perhaps the strongest barometer over the last 30 days is the performance of the country’s big chain stores. December turned out to be a blood bath for retailers at every rung on the economic ladder, with sales for the month growing at the slowest rate in seven years.  Sales at stores open at least a year, a crucial yardstick in retailing, plunged by 11 percent at Kohl’s and 7.9 percent at Macy’s, compared with last year… store sales fell 4 percent at Nordstrom, the high-end department store… the number of overdue payments on American Express cards is surging, the company said — and this among well-heeled cardholders… “We are seeing a correlation with housing prices,” said Michael O’Neill, a spokesman for American Express. “The falloff in spending is everywhere in the country, but it is greatest in those areas like south Florida and California, where home prices have fallen the most.”  The big exception is gasoline. American Express and the Consumer Federation of America say that consumers are buying just as many gallons as ever, but paying more for them, and that has forced cutbacks in other purchases… There are some bright spots now in consumer spending. Sales of sports gear and electronic gadgets — particularly G.P.S. navigation devices and flat-panel television sets — have risen over the last three months.”
From FTN:  “Consumer spending accounts for 70% of the economy. The only reason so many economists have not yet forecast a recession in 2008, including those at the Fed, is the strength of consumer spending in late 2007, especially in November when retail sales and consumption rose more than 1%. If fourth quarter sales turn out to be weaker, look for the recession forecast to gain a lot more support.”

Economic Legend Blames Fed for Credit Bubble Creation and Fallout
From The Telegraph:  “As rebukes go in the close-knit world of central banking, few hurt as much as the scathing indictment of US Federal Reserve policy by Professor Anna Schwartz.  The high priestess of US monetarism -- a revered figure at the Fed -- says the central bank is itself the chief cause of the credit bubble and now seems stunned as the consequences of its own actions engulf the financial system.  "The new group at the Fed is not equal to the problem that faces it," she says, daring to utter a thought that fellow critics mostly utter sotto voce.  "They need to speak frankly to the market and acknowledge how bad the problems are, and acknowledge their own failures in letting this happen. This is what is needed to restore confidence," she told The Sunday Telegraph.   "There never would have been a sub-prime mortgage crisis if the Fed had been alert. This is something Alan Greenspan must answer for," she says… Her fame comes from a joint opus with Nobel laureate Milton Friedman: "A Monetary History of the United States." It revolutionised thinking on the causes of the Great Depression when published in 1965. The book blamed the Fed for causing the slump. The bank failed to use its full bag of tricks to stop the implosion of the money stock, and turned a bust into calamity by raising rates… Schwartz warns against facile comparisons between today's world and the gold standard era. "This is nothing like the Depression. I don't really believe the economy as a whole is going to fall apart… More than 4,000 US banks -- a fifth -- collapsed in the 1930s. There was no deposit insurance. Real economic output fell by a third, prices by a quarter, and unemployment reached a third. Real income fell by 11 per cent, 9 per cent, 18 per cent, and 3 per cent in the years to 1933.  According to Schwartz the original sin of the Bernanke-Greenspan Fed was to hold rates at 1 per cent from 2003 to June 2004, long after the dotcom bubble was over. "It is clear that monetary policy was too accommodative. Rates of 1 per cent were bound to encourage all kinds of risky behaviour," Schwartz says.  She is scornful of Greenspan's campaign to clear his name by blaming the bubble on an Asian savings glut, which purportedly created stimulus beyond the control of the Fed by driving down global bond rates. "This attempt to exculpate himself is not convincing. The Fed failed to confront something that was evident. It can't be blamed on global events," she says.  That mistake is behind us now. The lesson of the 1930s is that swift action is needed once the credit system starts to implode: when banks hoard money, refusing to pass on funds. The Fed must tear up the rulebook. Yet it has been hesitant for three months, relying on lubricants -- not shock therapy.  "Liquidity doesn't do anything in this situation. It cannot deal with the underlying fear that lots of firms are going bankrupt," Schwartz says… Bernanke did indeed switch tack on Thursday. "We stand ready to take substantive additional action as needed," he says, warning of a "fragile situation…Bernanke insists that the Fed has leant the lesson from the catastrophic errors of the 1930s. At the late Milton Friedman's 90th birthday party, he apologised for the sins of his institutional forefathers. "Yes, we did it. We're very sorry. We won't do it again."”
From The Wall Street Journal:  “U.S. Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke, facing
criticism that the central bank has sent confusing messages about interest rates in recent months, has decided to speak more forcefully and more often… reflects a new strategy of having the central bank's top leaders discuss the economic outlook in public more often, so that markets won't depend on remarks by lower-ranked policy makers who may not represent Fed thinking. Thus, either Mr. Bernanke or Mr. Kohn will likely address the outlook in public at least once between meetings of the FOMC.”

Bank of America Gambles in Buying Countrywide
From Economist:  Countrywide, battered by an over-reliance on fickle wholesale funding and by fast-rising delinquencies (in good-quality mortgages as well as subprime ones) had been forced several times to deny that it was about to go bust. Banking is about confidence, and the markets did not believe its claims to have ample liquidity. Wall Street firms were increasingly worried that Countrywide would default on the huge pile of derivatives contracts it had struck with them in an effort to hedge its mortgage exposures. Regulators, too, were nervous: the liabilities of Countrywide’s bank had ballooned as it offered depositors high rates to keep itself funded. This raised the uncomfortable prospect of big payouts by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, should Countrywide have had to file for bankrupcty. Regulators probably helped to smooth the deal’s passage.  It carries big risks for BofA. It is buying a mortgage book that continues to deteriorate. Countrywide also faces a welter of lawsuits over its marketing of subprime loans. That said, the price looks potentially alluring—a mere eighth of Countrywide’s value a few months ago. Mr Lewis has long said that he likes the mortgage business, in which BofA trails its peers, but he feels that the mortgage companies themselves have been valued too highly. No one knows if that is still true of Countrywide, but there may be no better time to find out. And BofA, which has had teams poring over Countrywide’s books, probably knows its value better than any other outsider.  BofA perhaps felt compelled to intervene to protect its earlier investment. And it is better placed to act than others. It has been far less damaged by the mortgage mess than its arch-rival, Citigroup (though it has booked sizeable investment-banking losses). Having trailed for years, BofA is now worth $34 billion more than Citi. If the Countrywide deal pays off, it will be the undisputed leader in mortgages, as well as in credit cards (thanks to its purchase of MBNA three years ago) and overall retail banking (it is the only bank close to the 10% regulatory ceiling on nationwide deposits).  Countrywide’s attractions have been all but forgotten amid the über-pessimism over housing. It has 9m mortgage customers, to whom BofA will be itching to sell other financial products (though cross-selling is not easy). Its mortgage platform has unparalleled technology. The key will be to combine its loan-origination clout with BofA’s strength in distribution to investors. In short, Countrywide has plenty of franchise value… Even in the short term, it will be attractive for careful lenders, since profit margins have widened as credit has dried up. BofA is promising caution. It will ringfence Countrywide’s non-performing loans, handing them to a special workout team. And it will stop making subprime loans altogether. Not that Countrywide is doing much of that anyway: it lent a mere $6m to subprime borrowers in December, down from $3.7 billion in the same month of 2006.  The risks of this deal should not be underplayed. But BofA will see advantages beyond a potential lift to its mortgage business. The deal neatly lets it breach the 10% deposit ceiling because, under an arcane law, a bank can do so if it is through a takeover of another bank with a thrift charter (which Countrywide has). And the takeover will let it curry favour with regulators and politicians who want to see the markets stabilise.”

Shrinking U.S. Trade Deficit Requires Reducing U.S. Consumption
From John Mauldin:  “…the trade deficit is not going to come down until the US starts to save more and spend less. In 1992, consumer spending was a little over 65% of GDP. It is now closer to 72%. Savings are down from 8% in that time, to barely above zero. If US consumers simply saved 5%, as we did 10 years ago, the trade deficit would come down by a lot… Another $15 a barrel could add as much as $50 billion to the annual trade deficit.  That means oil alone will soon be more than 60% of our trade deficit, if oil stays above $90 a barrel.  Hard to cut the deficit with a lower dollar if we keep buying expensive oil… You reduce the trade deficit by spending less and exporting more.
However, we would have to grow exports by 90% to balance the trade deficit. Exports are up by 12% over a year ago, and most categories are up, but it is simply not realistic to think we can grow our way out of the trade deficit.  The heavy lifting on reducing the deficit is going to be by a reduction in spending. And that is only going to happen when people realize they have not saved enough for retirement and their homes are not a piggy bank that can be cashed out for retirement. And reduced consumer spending will not happen on just imports. It will be across the board and a drag on the economy.
From Business Week:  U.S. policymakers are mollycoddling American consumers. Of particular concern is the Bush administration's mortgage-freeze plan. By unilaterally shifting the financial pain to lenders, many of whom live overseas and don't vote in U.S. elections, politicians are making it clear that American consumers will not be allowed to suffer the ill effects of excessive indebtedness.  Damaging as the plan may be, it is nothing compared with what some presidential candidates and members of Congress are cooking up. As the housing crisis gets political, we can expect ideas such as a perpetual freeze on foreclosures, automatic loan reductions and enormous tax breaks financed by increased deficit spending. Delinquencies on auto loans are reaching record highs. What's next, a moratorium on car payments? In an election year, anything is possible.  With the U.S. economy finally stalling under its gargantuan debt burden, the rallying cries for Fed rate cuts have been deafening. Although "Helicopter" Ben Bernanke has done his part by cutting rates 100 basis points and devising new ways to shower the country in cash, his efforts have not been enough for ravenous bankers and politicians. Their zeal to keep the housing bubble from deflating, and the economy from tipping into recession, should make it clear to foreign investors that the United States will continue to rely on dollar depreciation as a blunt instrument to fight all its economic battles. As a result, America will remain a financial black hole in the coming year.  These are real risks that will not go unnoticed by a world already saturated with depreciating U.S.-dollar-denominated debt. Given that access to foreign savings is vital to America's economic survival, we should think twice before biting the hands that feed us.”

Goldman Sachs Reduces GDP Estimates for Asia Due to Slowing US Economy
From Goldman Sachs:  “Our US Economics Team has revised down their growth forecasts to show a mild recession this year, with GDP falling at an annualized one percentage point in 2Q and 3Q. As a result, we have cut our 2008 GDP growth forecast for Asia ex Japan to 8.3% from 8.6% before and compared to a consensus of 8.7%. In 2009, we now look for growth of 8.5% compared to 8.6% previously. Overall, these forecast reductions are meaningful but not disastrous-the impact on currencies is in general likely to be contained, although equity markets could be in for more volatility. China: More headwinds from trade-trimming our growth forecast to 10% for 2008 Given the significant contribution to growth from net exports, a meaningful slowdown in global demand, triggered by a US recession, would surely have a notable impact on China’s growth and corporate profitability. Therefore, we are lowering our already below-consensus 2008 growth forecast for China still further to 10% from 10.3%, with most of the additional weakness coming from slower export growth. Can India ride out the US recession storm? We are revising down our GDP growth forecast to 7.8% from 8% for FY09 due to a larger slowdown in external demand. We estimate that export growth will halve in FY09 to 9.8% from 18.6% due to the global slowdown as well as INR appreciation. However, the Indian economy remains largely on course due to structural strength. We expect the RBI to ease monetary policy in FY09 and for the INR to appreciate further against the USD in 2008. Taiwan: Navigating through the political landscape, amid weaker external demand In light of the downgrade to our GDP forecasts for the US and Asia, we are also revising our 2008 and 2009 GDP growth forecasts for Taiwan to 3.8% and 4.6% respectively, from our previous forecasts of 4.2% and 4.8% respectively. Our new forecasts put us below consensus… Our 2008 growth forecast for Japan was already below the market consensus, but we are lowering it still further to +1.0% from +1.2%. We are raising our 2008 CPI inflation forecast to +0.5% from +0.3% because CPI inflation is currently being fueled by surging crude oil prices. Excluding food and energy, however, and we expect CPI to remain low for the time being. A US recession and aggressive monetary easing by the Fed are likely to place major constraints on BOJ monetary policy. We are now forecasting that the BOJ will forego rate hikes entirely in 2008 and resume tightening in April-June 2009. The greatest challenge for the Japanese economy is a sustained recovery in private consumption. Innumerable obstacles stand in the way, most notably a decline in real purchasing power against a backdrop of stagnant wages and continued price increases on daily necessities.”
From JP Morgan:  One surprise from last week’s reports was the extent of the slowdown in China’s exports in 4Q07, which rose at a mere 2% annual rate, the smallest increase of the expansion by far. The growth of fixed asset investment also is thought to be slowing. These are substantial drags on manufacturing output, which is drawing support principally from the consumer sector. Our team expects that GDP growth eased to about 7.5% last quarter—near trend, but half the pace of 1H07. The Chinese government has taken steps to slow export growth, so it is hard to tell how much "signal" we’re getting from China about global demand.”
From Economist:  “Exports are the fulcrum of China's economic miracle, right? Not really, say some economists. Data issued by Chinese authorities show that exports amounted to almost 40% of gross domestic product in 2007. But Jonathan Anderson of Swiss bank UBS reckons that figure falls below 10% if imported components are stripped out. By that measure, China lags the U.S., where, in the first nine months of last year, net exports represented 30% of gross domestic product. The dynamo of the Chinese economy, as it turns out, is investment, much of it in infrastructure and heavy industry, with only 7% directly related to exports.”
From Deutsche Bank:  “On Friday, China said its forex reserves increased to $1.53 tn. This represents only a $95 bn or 6.6% quarterly increase, which is on par with Q3. Also, the growth rate of exports fell for the second straight month, likely due to a slower global economy.”

Lehman Reduces Growth Prospects for Europe
From Lehman:  “[European] GDP growth appears to have retreated considerably in Q4, falling to less than half the 0.8% q-o-q growth rate seen in Q3: we cut our estimate for Q4 from 0.4% q-o-q (sa) to 0.3% last week.  The main reason for looking for weaker growth is a loss of momentum in the industrial sector. This is augmented by a likely decline in retail spending at the aggregate level, only partly offset by stronger new car registrations.  We expect growth to slow further in Q1, as a slight recovery in household consumption should be dominated by even more weakness in investment, in part due to distortions in Germany associated with the expiry of accelerated depreciation allowances. More fundamentally, we expect investment growth to be low this year as firms’ access to bank financing becomes scarcer and more costly owing to the credit crunch and lower expected global growth filters through.”
From Merrill Lynch:  “The World Bank just cut its 2008 world growth outlook to 3.3% versus 3.6% in 2007 and 3.9% in 2006.  And the just-reported OECD leading indicator fell 0.5 points in November for the sixth time in as many months to its lowest level since August 2003.  So it would seem as though the US slowdown is beginning to leave its mark, at least through the industrialized world.”

MISC

From UBS:  “…today's WSJ suggests that while unlikely/remote, an inter-meeting [Fed rate] cut could come if the economic outlook deteriorates sharply in the coming days.”

From Market News International:  “The Kuwaiti Investment Authority is expected to be a major investor in a planned $4 bln capital raising by Merrill Lynch - FT.  Citigroup is putting the final touches to its second big    capital-raising, seeking up to $14 bln from Chinese, Kuwaiti and public market investors - FT.  Citigroup's plans to raise capital by selling a stake of about $2 billion to China Development Bank could be in jeopardy because of opposition from China's government.-WSJ”

From Bloomberg:  “The dollar fell to within a cent of its all-time low versus the euro on speculation U.S. interest rates will drop below those of the 15 nations that share the single European currency for the first time in three years… Fed funds futures contracts on the Chicago Board of Trade show 58 percent odds the Fed will cut its target rate for
overnight bank loans to 3.75 percent at its Jan. 30 meeting. The odds have risen from no chance a month ago. The odds of a decrease to 3.5 percent were 42 percent, compared with zero a week ago. The ECB kept its benchmark rate unchanged at 4 percent last week.  The yield spread between German two-year notes and same- maturity Treasuries was 1.12 percentage points, near the widest since November 2002.”

From Citi:  “We have just moved to the widest 2 year versus Fed funds inversion in a quarter of a century.”

From BMO:  2-year Treasury rates slid 19 bps to 2.56% last week after Bernanke flung open the door for aggressive easing. The 2-year rate is the lowest since the fed funds rate was at 1.75% more than three years ago. The 10-year rate dipped a lesser 8 bps to 3.79%, trolling four-year lows. With the Fed now in full reflation mode as it tries to get ahead of recession risks, the 10s-2s spread of 122 beeps is the steepest in three years.”

From Bear Stearns:  With the 30-year conventional mortgage rate dipping below 6.0% for the first time since 2005 there has been an increased focus on the potential for a major refinancing wave to sweep through the mortgage market. Indeed, at the current mortgage rate level of 5.90% we find that 37% ($1.81 trillion) of the conforming mortgage universe is refinanceable. If rates decline another 25 bps from here exposure increases to 50% ($2.47 trillion).  However, we do not expect today’s refinancing response to match the magnitude or intensity of prior”

From Bloomberg:  “U.S. existing home sales will fall 13 percent this year before recovering in 2009, according to a forecast by the Mortgage Bankers Association, the industry's largest trade group… New home sales likely will tumble 15 percent to 666,000
from 2007, before rising 6.6 percent in 2009… Mortgage originations for loans to buy homes will decline 18 percent to $955 billion in 2008, the report said. That's almost
half the $1.5 trillion lent in 2005 as the five-year real estate boom peaked. In 2009, purchase originations will rise 5 percent to $1 trillion, MBA said.  Loan refinancing will fall about 14 percent to $1 trillion this year…”

From Merrill Lynch:  “The precious metals complex is bid following Friday's "inflationary" DoA crops report that has sent the grains complex to new highs - that and aggressive market positioning for the Fed have taken gold up $15/oz so far today to $910/oz.  Interestingly, 10-year TIPS breakevens have come down to 223 bps, so not everyone is buying into the inflation story.”

From CNBC:  Citigroup plans to announce a writedown of as much as $24 billion and layoffs that could total as much as 24,000 due to subprime and credit-related losses, CNBC has learned. The plans will be unveiled Tuesday by Citigroup's new CEO, Vikram S. Pandit, after the banking giant reports fourth-quarter earnings. At the same time, Citigroup could also announce that it is cutting its dividend payment… Citigroup  also intends to raise as much as $15 billion from various foreign and domestic entities including Saudi Arabial Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, Citigroup's largest individual shareholder…”

From UBS:  “…the break lower in stocks has also been associated with a rise in volume —lending credence to the notion that the Bull move in S&P’s is over and that a new Bear phase has begun.”

From Merrill Lynch:  “The S&P 500 is off to its worst start since 1982 (-4.6%) and the Dow is off to its worst start since 1991 (-5.0%) – and both were recession years: Equities are now off for three weeks in a row in a losing streak not seen since last August, when the Fed was forced to cut the discount rate intermeeting and change its growth outlook.
Tech has actually surpassed financials on the down escalator – down 9.5% YTD versus down 5.4%. Meanwhile, health care is up 3.4% and utilities are up 1.7%, so not only the headline averages but the sector rotation is telling you that recession risks are alive and well. The fact that the yield curve – 10-year note yield minus the Fed funds rate – has been negative for 18 months in a row is a sure sign that the downturn has arrived. If not, it would be the first time that such a prolonged inversion failed to usher in a transition phase for the real economy.”

From Merrill Lynch:  “Food prices are soaring again on the latest bullish (not bullish for the buyer) DoA crop report, which sent corn futures to fresh 12-year highs… we have wheat at an all-time high with stockpiles at their lowest level since – get this – 1947. Soybean prices are at a 34-year high. This is an added source of angst for the consumer.”

From RBSGC:  “MBS Holdings Increased $9 bn, First Time in Four Weeks. MBS holdings by US banks increased $9 bn with pass-through holdings up $6 bn and CMO holdings up $3 bn. MBS holdings were down $41 bn over the last year (2007). Deposits decreased $17 bn over the past week. Deposits increased $518 bn over 2007. Commercial and industrial loans increased $4 bn for all banks over the week. C&I loans increased $243 bn over the last year. Whole loan holdings were virtually unchanged over the week. Over 2007, whole loan holdings increased by $214 bn.”

From JP Morgan:  “Barring a serious economic downturn, we expect financial firms’ capital requirements to be digestible. Concerns that issuance of stocks and bonds could overwhelm the markets in 2008 seem misplaced.  Although many banks and investment banks in North America and Europe have taken very large write-offs and face slower revenue growth, we expect internal measures, such as dividend reduction and suspension of share repurchases, to minimize the need for securities issuance. We think many banks will shrink their balance sheets, reducing the need for capital but also hampering credit creation.  The insurance and reinsurance industries are generally strong, and have relatively small needs for additional capital. Many bond insurers will require additional capital to cover their losses on collateralized debt obligations, but the sums involved are small relative to overall financial-sector issuance.  To the extent that financial firms require additional capital, we expect them to favor preferred and convertible securities over hybrids and common equity.”

From John Mauldin:  “The bottom half of taxpayers only pay 3% of the total income taxes collected, which is 1% less than before the Bush tax cuts. 44% of the US [adult] population, or 122 million people, pay no income tax at all.  The richest 1% of the country pay 39% of all taxes ($365,000 income and up), which is 3% more than before the Bush tax cuts, under the Clinton tax policy. The top 5% ($145,000) pay 60% of all taxes (up 5% from 1999); and the top 25%, with income over $62,000, paid 86% of all taxes…Every category is paying more now than under Clinton, except the bottom 75%.”
[Note – current U.S. population is 303 million, 2006 median U.S. household income was $48,200, based on U.S. Census data]

From Fidelity:  “Over the last 10 years, 72% of the world's best-performing stocks were based outside the United States.  International markets have delivered nearly twice the returns of domestic markets over the past five years.  On average, individual investors allocate only 7% of their portfolios to international investments, while professionally managed pension plans allocate 17%.

End-of-Day Market Update

From SunTrust:  “Stocks managed a triple-digit gain for a change. Bond prices are undeterred by equity strength and continue to hug recent highs on expectations of additional bank write-downs and weak economic news. In addition, there are a few random hopes out there for an inter-meeting cut from the FED any day. Event risk increases sharply beginning tomorrow.”

From RBSGC:  “Domestic equity prices gained throughout much of the session, with the DJIA, S&P 500, and NASDAQ all up more than 1%.”

Three month T-Bill yield rose 6bp to 3.15%.
Two year T-Note yield rose 1bp to 2.56%
Ten year T-Note yield fell 0 bp to 3.78%
2/10 Treasury curve flattened 1bp to 122bp
Dow rose 172 to 12,778 
S&P 500 rose 15 to 1416
Dollar index fell .37 to 75.61
Gold rose $10.5 to $906 (New all-time record high)
Oil rose $1.50 to $94.16
*All prices as of  4:10pm